Tirri Prank??
Can a “Tirri Prank” violate someone’s Right to Livelihood? A recent trend involving the so-called “Tirri Prank” has raised serious concerns about the impact of technology on the livelihoods of e-rickshaw drivers. In this video, I explain how Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which guarantees the Right to Life, has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to include the Right to Livelihood. When a daily wage earner is unable to work or earn because their e-rickshaw is suddenly stopped, the issue goes beyond a prank—it raises important constitutional and public policy questions. This video is not about fear. It is about accountability, responsible use of technology, and protecting the dignity and livelihood of hardworking people. If you believe this issue deserves the attention of the authorities, share this video, start conversations, and tag the concerned departments so appropriate action can be taken. 💬 What are your thoughts? Should such apps be investigated and regulated? Let me know in the comments. Keywords: Right to Livelihood, Article 21, Constitution of India…
Related
PODCAST 1 min read
From Moot Court to the Delhi High Court | A Conversation with an NLIU Student ft. Yajat
Most law students dream of winning a prestigious moot court competition. Very few have also appeared before…
VIDEO 1 min read
Best Free AI tool for legal research. Use my code - BTB10 for 10% discount.
Here’s a caption that hooks people, provides value, and naturally includes your affiliate disclosure: Using…
PODCAST 0:48:11
How to Build Your Litigation Career as a First-Generation Lawyer | Adv Krishan Gandhi
In this powerful conversation, Adv. Krishan Gandhi ( @AdvKrishan ) shares candid insights on what it really…
Start a thoughtful conversation
Share a perspective, ask a relevant question or add a useful resource. Email addresses are kept private.
Be the first to add something useful to this conversation.